Monday, July 10

Congress kept in dark on spying

What with the net neutrality issues and the war going on not only over terrorism, but intelligence vs. constitutional freedoms, and over the future freedom of the internet I cannot stay away from the political side of the issues. They reach out and drag me in.

The following article from The Australian is of utmost interest.

Congress kept in dark on spying | The World | The Australian

I find it quite interesting. that it's often the outside sources that can contain such poignant overviews of the state of American politics. I'm sure you'll let me know if you disagree and see in this some bias that I you think I might be unaware of. :)

Republican Congressman Peter Hoekstra (Michigan), chairman of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee (former supporter of the Bush administration's intelligence initiatives) speaks out on Fox News about his May 18th letter to Mr. Bush that was published in the New York Times this week.

This letter alleges...

1) "there was yet another intelligence program that the administration had not told Congress about"

2) "the operation in question was different from the wiretapping controversy or the covert monitoring of international financial transactions that the White House has been defending in recent weeks"

3) "that there was a dissident faction within the CIA that he said "intentionally undermined" the President's policies."

And separately according to The Australian;

4) "This confirmed rumours that have long circulated in Washington about the existence of a dissident group, which critics claim has selectively leaked stories to the media about the Bush administration's intelligence operations."

Even more interesting yet...

5) "US law requires that the intelligence panels of the Senate and the House of Representatives be informed of the Government's intelligence activities.

Mr Hoekstra said his intelligence committee learned about some undisclosed operations from whistleblowers who alerted Congress to what they believed were illegal activities."


Most interestingly this would seem to suggest that whistleblowers abound in the intelligence community. Indeed it would appear from this and many other cases that we have rampant whistleblowing going on in the intelligence community, and is it any wonder after the failure in the intelligence community under political pressure from the Bush administration leading up to the war in Iraq?

The ramification of that failure of intelligence prior to the Iraq war has caused a crisis of trust within the intelligence community and above all between the intelligence community, congress, and the Bush administration.

"If these allegations are true, they may represent a breach of responsibility by the administration, a violation of law, and, just as importantly, a direct affront to me and the members of this committee who have ardently supported efforts to collect information on our enemies"


That from Mr. Hoekstra's letter which was posted in the NY Times.


Another interesting aspect of this is that while the NY Times has been at the center critical press regarding the Bush administration (most obviously in the scandal regarding unauthorized wiretapping) that they are not by any means alone and have been joined by a huge chorus of other newspapers.

On a side note there is a very interesting similarity to the way consensus is made in big media and small media. Which is to say between the newspaper press and blogging. Consensus is not as transparent or organic in the world of newspapers, but it is effective non the less. But back on point...

Indeed the truth of most of these allegations by the NY Times and other papers has never been called into question merely the techniques by which information is gathered.

If any of you have seen the recent movie Good Night, and Good Luck... you'd likely agree that there are many similarities in the showdown between Edward Murrow / CBS and McCarthy and this current showdown between the NY Times and the Bush administration on the publics constitutional rights.

Needless to say NY Times is a shinning example of the free press in action and for me restores some faith in mainstream media.

And a special thanks to Geoff Elliott of The Australian for the article. It's a shinning example that you need not be in the middle of the debate to be relevant. Something I'm acutely aware of when rambling away on my little blog here.

Thursday, July 6

RocketBoom, the evilution of media and exploding narratives

RocketBoom Goes Boom
RocketBoom Goes Boom
, higres version

For those of you whom haven't heard the wildly popular Rocketboom has broken up. Amanda has left for LA it appears, and Andrew is looking for a new host or hosts.

I must admit I infrequently watched rocketboom (SOO much material). Still I'm a little sad that I will not be able to flip to an episode of rocketboom anytime the thought occurs to me and be rewarded with fresh, interesting and fun news.

Rocketboom was never about watching every episode to me. Rocketboom was a gathering place, an ideological mindspace, an ongoing conversation and my favorite watering hole (figuratively speaking of course) where I knew that I could pop in and see farmiliar faces and hear about the latest and most interesting news in regards to my geek lifestyle and general technological tomfoolery.

Do to the fact that it's been a tremendous two years, that Rocketboom was started on a non-existant budget, that for almost the whole two straight 2 years Rocketboom was a 5 day a week grind (rain or shine) I am not suprised to see the split between Amanda Cogdon and Andrew Baron. I'm rather impressed and in awe of their drive and staying power in fact.

I hope that Andrew, Amanda and their audience will not let the end in anyway overshadow the success Rocketboom has had.

The growth and success of Rocketboom has personally been beyond my wildest dreams with viewership well into the hundreds of thousands a day. (I've heard reports of as many as 350,000 viewers a day, though I can scarcely believe it.)

As as a flagship video blog Rocketboom has been a great first introduction to coutless thousands to the world of video blogging. (Much preffered to horrid alternative introductions such as Youtube.)

It was through Rocketboom Andrew, Amanda and other vloggers were able to break new ground and reach into new markets like set top boxes and the cellular markets. It will be due in large part to Rocketboom's success in pushing of the boundries that I hope all of video blogging will slowly follow into these new markets and platforms.

Rocketboom has been thus far the tip of the spear that has pierced perceptions, expectations, markets and platforms to help break down the walls of old media. When it was started barely 100 vlogs existed. It was a dart thrown at a board back before any of us had any idea how this market would shape up and many would argue we still don't. As such I think Andrew's instinct and aim were incredibly true.

Now there are by my calculations over 10,000 video podcasts / vlogs and almost 200 video sharing sites. We have some concept of where Rocketboom fits into this space, but you must remember that this landscape was largely a blanks hole in cyberspace only two years ago. Almost none of these vlogs or services existed before Rocketboom started and during this time Rocketboom has acted as a beacon, setting an grand example for those to follow both in it's openess (syndicatable and downloadable), it completeness and compatibility (iPod, PSP, bittorent), and its simplicity as a vlog with a single cohesive voice, Amanda.

Without Rocketboom and other independant successes like it vlogging would have long ago succumbed to domain of proprietary systems and walled garden services like Youtube. Rocketbooms importance and all independant vlogs and vloggers importance as examples must not be underestimated. It should be recognized and applauded.

Rocketboom has had its detractors, indeed I never thought nor assumed Amanda and Andrew creation to be perfect. Such notions of what is "worthy" is completely contrary to everything vlogging, podcasting and blogging is about. Andrew and Amanda (despite the her obvious looks and charm) didn't speak up because they were perfect or great, noble, or because they were trying to live up to an expectation created by commercial media. There is no illusion there, just a $10 map of the world, a Tandy computer prop and some humor.. but like all bloggers, podcasters and vloggers they spoke up because it is far far better to participate in the conversation rather than to be a spectator.

The truth is that mass media is now part of the conversation of life itself. To be a spectator of blogging, podcasting, and videobloging is to be a spectator of life, politics and culture itself. And Rochetboom has proven as much.

We speak despite our imperfections because by such a standard noone should or would speak their minds. Participation is the life blood of new media and of course our democracy and as such all our rich media participation shall like the written words of those individuals before us breath new life into this democracy, world debates, and global cultures.

(Forgive the high level political tangent, I blame it on the 4th of July. ;)


It appears the split between Andrew and Amanda happened over the inability to work out the details for collaboration as Amanda moved from to NY to LA to pursue her acting carreer.

As a ground breaker and the vanguard of video blogging I hope Andrew and Rocketboom will recoop with a new host, or better yet new co-hosts and grow to a whole new level. I hope as well Amanda will find success in LA and not forget her vloggy roots but take them with her and let them drive her success in a more traditional media world.

While I will will miss Amanda on Rocketboom I think this is a great opportunity for both. For Amanda this split should give her the opportunity to take her acting carreer to new levels and for Andrew I think this is a chance to take what he's learned from the last two years of Rocketboom and go in a whole great new direction with Rocketboom. I expect exciting new times are a head for both.

While Amanda owns 49% of rocketboom I sincerly hope their split will be amicable and they'll be able to do it nice clean break so they can both move on find continued success. I implore them to find a way to make an agreement on a clean break and set their minds quicky on new opportunities. To not dwell.

Personally I'd like to see Rocketboom continue with TWO part time correspondants whom can either alternate and or co-host the show together. (Five or Six days a week is such a grind.)

Secondly, I'd like to see a Rocketboom extended edition (as the default episode) focusing more on materials from the rocketboom correspondants, growing the correspondant pool, and taking more submissions from the audience, reviewing and sharing more video based clips, and driving more traffic to bloggers and vloggers to encourage participation. It's time for Rocketboom to expand their staff and reach.

Third I'd like to see rocketboom focus on bridging the gap between the new world of media and the old. I always thought that an regular episodic vlog like rocketboom could find a place amongst a progressive show like Current TV, MTV, or G4Tech TV. (G4 Tech TV has in fact moved toward Rocketboom with Video podcasts like Attack of the Show.)


The mechanisms for aggregating bottom up material in a transparent and public way and shapping them into a daily show now exist. They've been perfected by blogs like boingboing and services like Slashdot, digg.com and flickr. All that need be done is to selectively apply some of those principals to video based media and to choose from amongst the bubbling mass of participatory media a final selection or two a day to include in the show.

It is not about "viral media" either. It's about moving beyond the spectacle and finding that which is relevant to the conversations.

The promise, that which Current TV hyped but failed to deliver now exists. It's time for media to get more participatory, more journalistic. It's time to stop looking at the participants as spectators, eyeballs or cutomers and start thinking of them as a community of creators.

I would love to see the hand of the creators in the final product. Not just the hand of Andrew, the host (or hosts!) and the correspondants which is already present.... but an ever increasing roll of the audience.

I'd love to see Rocketboom as well as other vlogs and similar media focus on melting away the age old boundries between creators and the audience and experiment on making them one in the same.

I'd love to see rocketboom encourage viewers to set up their own vlogs and encourage them to make their own matterial for rocketboom and post it to their own vlogs... tagging specific videos and submitting their own feed to a community of Rocketboom "feeder pool" so matterials could be aggregated, viewed by the rocketbooom community and out of the commenting, viewing and sharing of this media a group of editors derive a daily show.

As mentioned these mechanisms already exist and are being improved on every day. In the future, the almighty narrative will not be withing the end episode itself, not just in the continuity from episode to episode... but it is being slowly deconstructed and exploded. The narrative of media is becoming the conversations that goes into the creation of the show itself. The narrative is exploding. The abstraction of episodic media will be offset by the transparency and the depth of the narrative woven into its creation. Instead of becoming superficial and shallow, it will become for its participants more real and valueable than ever because they will have a hand in the dialogue and the creation of it's meaning.

I would hope that whatever Rocketboom does they merely consider this evilution of media in their process. Good luck to Amanda and Andrew! I wish you both the best!

Dislaimer: written pretty much steam of conscious, not proof read or spell checked. Deal with the imperfections and try to enjoy it anyway. :)

Some related audio rocketboom.mp3

Update:

It appears that Amanda has NOT made plans to move to LA... a missunderstanding perhaps... a misquote, it doesn't matter. Inconsequential, but none the less I didn't want to misreport any details.

Wednesday, June 21

Video Blogging, the book

Video Blogging, the bookJay Dedman, Josh Kinberg and Joshua Paul's new book on video blogging is out on Amazon. Congratulations guys!

From: amazon.com

It's the ultimate reality show, YOURS

Amazing, isn't it? You're on equal footing with multibillion-dollar TVand movie producers. Videoblogging lets your audience see your cause,your story, or your personal creations?and you can distribute your showto anyone with Internet access. And since the videobloggingcommunity is all about sharing, more than 20 expertshave kicked in tips and ideasto make this book the ultimatevideoblogging crash course. So head for the checkout, grabfresh batteries for your videocamera, and let's get started!

Think Big



Via: unmediated.org


highres

Saturday, June 17

YouTube: ALL YOUR VIDEOS ARE BELONG TO US

YouTubeHackHa, I've been riffing on Youtube for a while, and this is a little old, from the 3rd, but yeah, apparently Youtube thinks it's own evilness is funny.

They were doing some maintence and temporarily riffed the old "All your base are belong to us" meme posting "all your video are belong to us" on their homepage.

The thing is I don't think anyone was laughing considering that youtube really is a media trap and all. Not only can you not download your own videos, but you also give away a tremendous amount of your rights to youtube for them to use your media however they pleased. Your recourse? To cancel your account.

Anyway, all this is to say one thing,

Youtube is a media trap, you've been warned.

more info: People With Ideas » Blog Archive » YouTube: ALL YOUR VIDEOS ARE BELONG TO US

Friday, May 19

Great overview of 19 random video sharing sites

Mediathink released a 14 page (or so) whitepaper on May 5th entitled, " Understanding the impact of online video (iVOD) on marketing and advertising".

It looks interesting. One day I'll actually read it and have an opinion to share, maybe tomorrow, maybe never.

It contains an excellent chart of a small percentage of the video sharing sites, most of which have popped up in the last 18 months. Even if you don't read the article the graph is pretty interesting.

Mediathink: Understanding the impact of online video (iVOD) on marketing and advertising

One important side note. I love that they've seen fit to try coin their own name for this little revolution in media; "iVOD". And here people I know have been arguing about terms like vlogging, video podcasting, videocasting, and all manner of terminology for the last 18 months and I've never heard someone once call it iVOD'ing.

iVOD'ing, can I use it that way? How about plural? iVODs? I wouldn't want to sound like an idiot. Perhaps Mediathink should publish a glossary of terms so we mere mortals can educate ourselves so we don't sound like idiots when we emulate them.

LOL.

Sorry, that was cruel. We all make up our own silly words. It's natural, but the emphasis is still on silly. I guess Meediathink is just as silly as the rest of us.

Saturday, April 22

Something else for the pan. :)

"Mr. Rogers Breakdancing"

Mr. Rodgers freaks me out.

Watch movie (, 3.2 min, 19.4 MB)

Original post, from Film Threat Video:

It's not that he doesn't have the moves, or that he's blatantly ripping off that time Mr. T tried to learn breakdancing, but he sounds creepy while he does it.

(Via Mefeedia)

Friday, April 21

"Laser Cats", Another short from SNL by the Andy Amberg and the Lonely Island Guys.

"Laser Cats"

Watch movie (, 3.5 min, 20.7 MB)

Original post, from Film Threat Video:

Cats that shoot lasers from their mouths. Another SNL digital short that shows that you really don't need to pay attention to anything that doesn't involve Andy Samberg.

(Via Mefeedia)

t-video.blogspot.com is a one of a kind video podcast I stumbled on quite some time ago and have been an increasing fan though I've never heard anyone else mention them. So I thought I would. I can't really explain it, it's just beautiful abstract video art. Think of it as time based photography. :)

Enjoy.

"Frommap"

Watch movie (Quicktime, 2 min, 12.9 MB)

Original post, from .t video:

iPod video installation 11

(Via Mefeedia)

C for Cookie

I couldn't not post this trailer mashup.

"V for Vendetta" meets "C for Cookie".

Elmo at his finest.

"C for Cookie"

Watch movie (, 1.8 min, 10.5 MB)

Original post, from Film Threat Video:

V for Vendetta meets Sesame Street so children everywhere can learn about anarchy.

(Via Mefeedia)

Thursday, April 20

An interview with Dave Winer

Sweet, I'm re-vlogging rocketboom. And why the hell not, even though they have a zillion times the traffic as me, there's still value in saying, heh, this is great, I dig this. So here's an interview of Dave Winer, the much loved and often arguable, father of RSS 2.0 w/enclosures and therefore podcasting. I listen to him all the time on podcasts, but rarely do I get to see him on film, so this was a real treat.

Most important quote: "Myspace is training wheels"

I never quite could put my finger on it, but Dave nails it. This to me is what services like Youtube, livejournal and Myspace represent... they're easy little walled garden communities that act as an entry point for many young people and people who are new to the blogosphere. Eventually though most of them will hopefully move onto participating in a larger, more interoperable community, a global community, the world wide blogosphere. (global village anyone?) And there are many facets of the blosphere, in fact it's sliceable in an endless variety of ways, most obviously language, and media type (audio, photo, video) right now. But gradually I hope these soft boundries will continue to mix in a healthy manner, into an endless mix of communities with soft boundries, not hard inoperable boundries like Youtube. So, Enjoy the interview. Thanks Amanda. Oh, and if you follow the link to the original post there's even more interview segments. Be sure to leave some comments on rocketboom. Vloggers love comments! :)

"Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:35:10 -0600"

Watch movie (Quicktime, 5 min, 26.7 MB)

Original post, from Rocketboom:

story links: interview with dave winer extended interview: on the future of advertising (mov|wmv), on the history of the personal computer (mov|wmv), on the holiday season (mov|wmv), on habits online (mov|wmv), on the ownership of rss (mov|wmv), on writing style (mov|wmv)

(Via Mefeedia)

Saturday, April 8

CD Baby's sales by month through 2005

CD babies sales by month through 2005This may be sort of old news to most. It was posted back on February 8th, but I thought it was interesting just the same.

This graph shows CD Baby's sales numbers by month fince they started back in 1997 through December 2005.

Here are some interesting factoids

2004 CD sales : $7.5M
2005 CD sales: $10.3M

2004 digital sales: $0.76M
2005 digital sales: $3.1M

new CDs added in 2004: 28,285
new CDs added in 2005: 37,798


The increase in digital sales is what I find interesting. It'll be interesting to see what they are in a year or two.

CDBaby is a great story. They may still be doing "only" about $14 million in revenue a year, but they're the best promoter of independant musicians. I'm no musician, but they kick so much butt even I'm tempted to create an album and put it out there. :)

What I'm waiting for is the first seller of independant films and movies. A DVD Baby if you will, but of course DVD's are incosequential. What we're really talking about is purchaseable DIVX and MP4 videos. I have lots of vlogger friends who have indepenant films and film projects and I dream one day they'll be a market just for them.

Via: http://cdbaby.org/stories/06/02/08/3949734.html

Monday, April 3

Bent - Circuit Bending Festival

Bent2004DVBlog has had a couple of great posts that caught my eye in the last week. If you enjoyed my recent post on the history of the amen break beat (also via DVblog) you'll certainly enjoy this clip from BENT 2004. It's a good introduction to the musical world of circuit bending and a great reminder to everyone who's going to be in New York on April 19-23 to swing by and check out the Third International Circuit Bending Festival, aka BENT 2006 (bentfestival.org).

Watch movie (Quicktime, 8.4mb, 5min)

Original post, from DVblog:

BENT (2004, 8.43MB, 5 min. ) This short documentary explains what circuit bending is and why you want to attend BENT 2006 , the Third International Circuit Bending Festival , April 19-23, in NYC.

(revlogged via Mefeedia)

Will the Summer Make Good for all our Sins - a film short

Will the Summer Make Good for all our Sins - a film short

"Will the Summer Make Good for all our Sins"
A great short film / music video / animation

Watch movie (Quicktime, 4.3 min, 34.8 MB)

Band: MUM
Artist: Marc Craste
Studio AKA, London

Original post, from No fat clips!!!:

Múm revolves around the core trio of Icelanders Gunnar Örn Tynes, Örvar Thóreyjarson Smárason and Kristín Anna Valtysdóttir. Based between Reykjavik and Berlin, since their foundation in 1998, múm have forged a gorgeously warm, rich and melodic take on electronica, imprinting it with their own unique sound.

...The song merges hauntingly beautiful music with darkly sinister lyrics, a style synonymous with Marc Craste’s animations. (Source: Fat Cat)
...
Marc Craste is the director of numerous award-winning commercials. His short film Jojo in the Stars won both the 2004 BAFTA for Best Animated Short Film & the 2005 Cartoon d'Or.

If you like this short film you might also want to check out the trailer for Jojo in the Stars (Flash required) or this beautiful high res movie poster from 2003.

(Revlogged with Mefeedia)

Tuesday, March 28

Feedback on mefeedia

A second very interesting post about mefeedia today.

From: A Zulu In Silicon Valley

I like mefeedia. Why?

Because unlike Yahoo! Podcasts (which I like), I can accumulate all my video feeds into a single feed which I can stream into my iTunes player. And this is great because I can only add video posts within feeds that match my tags selected.

And tags are well structured by place, topic, person, language or event. I find this service really easy to use. I can browse video podcasts or add my own feeds. It's nice and easy.

I also like their 'related tags' section which allows me to browse forever.Outside of adding feeds, you can manually add individual videos by clicking a 'queue' button.

This service is not pretty, but it's fun to use and easy to get going. I have no idea how they intend to make money though...

PR on mefeedia

Interesting profile of mefeedia: Under the Radar » Blog Archive » Feed Me Meedia one of two interesting today.

MeFeedia
Sector: media search

Secret Sauce: Mefeedia is a small startup company based in New York City whose mission is to make independent video on the internet easy to find and share. Mefeedia is a videoblog directory on the web, considered by many to be the first of its kind. In 2004, Jay Dedman and Peter Van Dijk started the videoblogging mailing list. Today, Mefeedia is building a ?kind of IMDB for independent video. Make independent video easy to find.? To find your way around our 248,616 videos, Mefeedia has tags and an extensive directory of vlogs (6,813 videoblogs). The service is free with future optional pro features in the works. Peter Van Dijck, founder of Mefeedia: ?Quite a few people have told me they?ve temporarily stopped watching regular television altogether, at least for a while. There is too much good stuff out there.? Mefeedia focuses on the video that is being produced by ?videobloggers?, thousands of people who are creating all sorts of short videos and publishing them on their blog. Mefeedia functions as an aggregator, a portal where you can discover these videoblogs.
Peter Van Dijck: ?The future is here: the video iPod, iTunes video, the PSP, the upcoming XBox: people are getting access to millions of channels of video. And at the same time regular people can now finally publish video online easily. In this future, your favourite tv channel might soon be someone you know.?

Competitors: PodZinger, PodScope

Headquarters: New York, NY

Founded: 2004

Management: Peter Van Dijck is the founder ? he is a well known information architect and author.

Seen and Heard: Named ?Best of the Web? by BusinessWeek and Forbes. Also Time wrote, ?If video blogs are your thing, try Mefeedia.?